US magazine PC World has put Windows Vista through the wringer. The conclusions are a concern for any casual buyers taken in by the 'newer is better' mantra coming from Redmond.
PC World says "Vista is generally slower than XP, but better at multitasking on dual-core PCs." It also warns that "you need a minimum 1Gb of RAM for it to be worth having Vista."
So clearly you need to check the spec of your machine (or intended new machine) before you bother with Vista at all. Also it raises the question of why anyone would buy a new PC in January - Vista isn't being launched globally until 30 January and so don't expect it to be preloaded on your new machine any day soon.
Microsoft must do better?
Vista Refuseniks are predictably many in number. Concerns focus on the new stringent licensing restrictions, Digital Rights Management, and User Account Control. Wikipedia has an excellent overall review which summarises all the critical issues.
Gossip: The hundreds of journalists that attended the UK launch of Vista at Arsenal's shiny new football Stadium last month were kept waiting for hours while various wonderous claims were made for the new software.
General grumbling ensued and was compounded when they were told that they would not be leaving with a nice shrink-wrapped pack of Vista each (which they all expected). But Microsoft - masters in the art of persuasion - had a trump card up its sleave. Just before they left journalists were told that they would each be getting, gratis, a new PC pre-loaded with Vista. To my knowledge these PCs have not yet been dispatched, but rest assured most of the copy has been filed.
In the US this free giveaway tactic has caused a bit of negative discussion. Take this at NowPublic.com for example. The piece names and shames top bloggers that got free PCs.
Recent Comments